208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22676 of 2024 Date of Decision: 02.05.2025 Sukhbir Singh …..Petitioner. Versus Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Deepak Arya, Advocate for Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1. Both the counsel are ad-idem that on account of compromise arrived at between the parties, the issue raised in the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 02, 2025 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2025.05.05 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment