Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85822 (KAR)

AYUB S/O SANNAHASANSAB NADDIMULLA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/102286/2025 · 2025-10-29

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14657 WP No. 102286 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102286 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: AYUB S/O SANNAHASANSAB NADDIMULLA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT 429/24, IRANI COLONY, GADAG- 582101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH B. HUBLIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE- 560001. 2. NOUREEN BANU D/O SAYYAD RASHID MAKANDAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT #297, NOOR ZARA MANSION, BAFNA LAYOUT, NEAR GANGIMADI FLYOVER, GADAG- 582103. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTING THE HON’BLE JMFC-1 COURT, GADAG, TO DISPOSE OF CRL. MISC. 328/2024 IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHIN A FIXED TIMEFRAME. THIS DIRECTION IS TO BE ISSUED WITHOUT THIS HON’BLE COURT UNDERTAKING ANY INQUIRY INTO OR VERIFICATION OF THE VERACITY OF THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE SAID APPLICATION, AS SUCH DETERMINATION IS THE EXCLUSIVE FUNCTION OF THE TRIAL RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Date: 2025.10.31 06:27:36 +0000 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14657 WP No. 102286 of 2025 COURT AT THIS STAGE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) This Court, by order dated 22.09.2025, had passed the following direction: “1. Three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections. 2. If the office objections are not complied with by 16.10.2025, re-list on 29.10.2025 for dismissal under the caption ‘dismissal’.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance of the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-GTB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62