- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9630 CRP No. 100021 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 100021 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KIRAN S/O. PANDURANG HOSKOTI AGE. 47, OCC. BUSINESS AND APICULTURE, R/O. NAGRAL, RAIBAGH TOWN TALUK. RAIBAGH, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK AND SRI. SAI KIRAN B. NAIK, ADVOCATES) AND: M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT “LANDMARK” RACE CORSE CIRCLE, VADODARA-390007 HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT EUREKA JUCTION, TRAVELERS BUNGLOW ROAD, HUBBALLI TALUK. HUBBALLI DIST. DHARWAD -580029 REPRESENTED BY TAJODDIN S/O. BUDDESAHEB KANDGAL AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. DEBT MANAGER R/O. ICICI BANK LTD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580029 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN OS NO.124/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUBBALLI AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.09.2023 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE HUBBALLI, IN OS NO.124/2022, ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE NO.3 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION AND THE DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT TO RETURN THE PLAINT FOR PRESENTATION TO THE PROPER JURISDICTIONAL COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.08.06 11:05:44 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9630 CRP No. 100021 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL In these petitioner submits as under. It is submitted that, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above petition. The petitioner humbly submits hat the case is amicably settled between the parties and respondent has agreed to withdraw the suit before the trial Court. Hence, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition in the ends of justice and equity.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE AC CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 17