Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85817 (KAR)

R KALYAN S/O R VENKATANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/108952/2014 · 2025-09-11

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11846 WP No. 108952 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 108952 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: MR. R.KALYAN, S/O. R. VENKATANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. NO. F-6, GAVI KRUPA APARTMENTS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, PARVATHI NAGAR, BELLARY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI M.AMAREGOUDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELLARY DISTRICT, BELLARY. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BELLARY TALUK, BELLARY. 4. THE SUBSIDIARY INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DELHI REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ASHOK T. KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) (R3 AND R4 SERVED) Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11846 WP No. 108952 of 2014 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ENDORSEMENT NO.56/ESTT(G- 1)/2013(3)-640 INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ANNEXURE-H DATED 19.03.2014 AND HOLDING THAT THE CANCELLATION OF APPOINTMENT IS ARBITRARY AND IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14, 16 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE AN APPOINTMENT ORDER PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE FINALIZATION OF VERIFICATION BEFORE THE CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, AS DIRECTED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ANNEXURE-K DATED 03.09.2014 IN WP NO.104159/2014. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed off accordingly. Submission is placed on record. Writ petition is disposed off as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE KMS CT:GSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37