IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19626 of 2024 ====================================================== Lalita Devi Wife of Birendra Mahto, Resident of Village- Mashaha, Ward No.- 1, P.O.- Pipara Bishanpur, P.S.- Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector- Cum- Distt.- Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 3. The Addl. Collector Land Reform Department, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Pupri, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 5. The Block Development Officer, Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 6. The Circle Officer, Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 7. Chhedi Sah, Son of Late Khobhari Sah Resident of Village- Mashaha, P.O.- Pipara Bishanpur, P.S.- Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 8. Chandrashekhar Sah, Son of Chhedi Sah Resident of Village- Mashaha, P.O.- Pipara Bishanpur, P.S.- Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 9. Fekan Sah, Son of Chhedi Sah Resident of Village- Mashaha, P.O.- Pipara Bishanpur, P.S.- Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6. : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, AC to GP-6. : Mr. Harish, AC to GP-6. : Mr. Rohit Singh, AC to GP-6. : Mr. Ranaveer Prawar, AC to GP-6. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 09-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for removal of the encroachment of the land by private respondent nos.7 to 9 forcefully who made pacca house over the raiyati land of petitioner. Patna High Court CWJC No.19626 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025 2/2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondent nos.7 to 9 have encroached the land of petitioner and constructed the house despite his representation pending before the authority. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the dispute in the present writ petition relates between the private parties with respect to the title and possession, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the dispute in the present writ petition relates to title and possession of the land between the private parties, this writ petition is not maintainable and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U