Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8580 (RAJ)

KRITIKA PAREEK D/O DESH BANDHU SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3091/2025 · 2025-03-05

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9708] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3091/2025 Kritika Pareek D/o Desh Bandhu Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 106, Ward No. 1, Todapur, Hailey Mandi, District Gurgaon, Haryana. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner, College Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Principal, Babu Shobharam Govt. Arts College, Alwar. 4. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Barodameo, Alwar. 5. The Principal, Govt. College, Bibirani, Alwar. 6. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Kishangarhbas, Alwar. 7. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Bhiwadi, Alwar. 8. The Principal, Govt. College, Bahadurpur, Alwar. 9. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Rajgarh, Alwar. 10. The Registrar, Opjs University, Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/03/2025 Learned counsel for respondent has submitted that vide order dated 15.07.2024 issued by Ayuktalya, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur, qua OPJS University, Churu all the candidates were directed to submit their documents with the respondents at the earliest and until the said direction is complied with, the said [2025:RJ-JP:9708] (2 of 2) [CW-3091/2025] candidates were not invited to be a part of the faculty, as a policy decision. After considering the arguments put forth by respective parties, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner be provisionally permitted to appear in the selection process, and her candidature will remain subject to verification and outcome of the document verification. It is made clear that no rights will be reserved for provisional participation in the document verification process, and the direction noted hereinabove shall not create a vested right qua the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-257