CHHOTU KUMAR ALIAS CHHOTU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2079/2025 · 2025-04-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8580 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8580 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:10100 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2079 of 2025
------ Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Yadav, aged about 28 years, S/o Rajeshwar Yadav, R/o Village-Ghasidag, P.O.-Gharatiya, P.S.- Bishrampur, Dist.-Palamau State-Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 02-04-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawa Bazar P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under sections 108 of B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has abetted the suicide of Nirmala. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that only because the petitioner was frequently talking with the informant; hence, suspicion has been raised that the petitioner might have abetted the suicide of the deceased. It is then submitted that there is no material in the record to show any overt act of the petitioner; which could have led the deceased to commit suicide. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamau in connection with Nawa Bazar P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/