IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14877 of 2018 ====================================================== Rameshwar Das @ Rameshwar Yadav, Son of Late Yadu Nandan Yadav, Resident of VillageP.O. Naudega, P.S. Biraul, District Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 3. The Additional Collector-cum-First Appellate Authority, Public Grievance Redressal, Darbhanga, Dist. Darbhanga. 4. The Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Biraul, District Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha – AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 18-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ or writs setting aside the order dated 20.01.2017 passed by the 1st Appellate Authority, Public Grievance Redressal Forum, Darbhanga in Issue No. 41311-03853 as well as order dated 23.11.2016 passed by the Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga in Issue No. 51331-00961 by which claim of the petitioner has been rejected and further respondents be directed not to interfere in the possession of the petitioner with respect to the land in question by treating it as a public land as the same is the raiyati Patna High Court CWJC No.14877 of 2018(4) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 land of the petitioner for which he has valid right, title and interest and/or to grant any other relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is alternative remedy to the petitioner to file second appeal against the order of the First Appellate Authority dated 20.01.2017. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority. 5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 6. In view of the submission of the learned counsels for the parties, this case is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. If the petitioner files second appeal before the competent authority within four weekss, the concerned authority shall consider that the petitioner has filed the writ petition on 27.07.2018 and the same has been disposed of by this order. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U