HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1367/2010 1. 2. Sukhdeo Gurjar (since deceased), 1/1 Munna Devi, W/o Sukhdeo Gurjar 1/2 Diljeet, S/o Sukhdeo Gurjar 1/3 Sajan S/o Sukhdeo Gurjar, All R/o Old City, Kishangarh. Pawan Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma, aged 28 years, Resident Of Old City, Kishangarh. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Collector (Stamps) cum Deputy Inspector General (Registration) Ajmer. 2. The Sub Registrar, Roopan Garh, District Ajmer. ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1368/2010 Chiranjilal aged 36 years Son Of Shri Bhanwarlal Tak, resident of Sindhi Colony, Madanganj, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Collector (Stamps) Cum Deputy Inspector General (Registration), Ajmer. 2. The Sub Registrar, Roopan Garh, District Ajmer. ----Respondents D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1369/2010 Dudharam son of Shri Bhanwarlal Gurjar, aged 29 years, resident of Rajaredi, Madanganj Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Collector (Stamps) cum Deputy Inspector General (Registration), Ajmer. 2. The Sub Registrar, Roopan Garh, District Ajmer. ----Respondents (2 of 3) [CW-1367/2010] For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sanjay Mehrishi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Kartikeya Sharma, Adv. for Mr.Sandeep Taneja, AAG. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/03/2025 1. These three writ petitions are decided by a common order as the facts and issue involved are similar. For convenience, the facts are being taken from D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1367/2010. 2. This petition is filed against orders dated 02.09.2009 and 13.11.2009 passed by the Collector (Stamps) deciding the revision against the petitioners and dismissing the application for clarification. 3. The brief facts are that the petitioners purchased half share of land from Chotu Son of Madu situated in khasra No.319 village Madanganj, Tehsil Kishangarh, Ajmer. On the basis of inspection the difference in valuation revealed and a reference was made under Section 51 of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1988 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) to the Collector (Stamps) for initiating the action under Section 53(3) of the Act. After issuance of notice to the petitioner and considering the objections filed to the inspection report and affording an opportunity of hearing, the impugned order was passed valuating the land purchased at Rs.1,72,76,310/- and creating a demand of Rs.12,83,100/- including the penalty amount. 4. The petitioners have a remedy of revision under Section 65 of the Act. The issue involved in the present writ petition is with (3 of 3) [CW-1367/2010] regard to valuation of the land purchased which needs adducing of evidence and is not a case for interference in the writ jurisdiction. 5. Considering that the petitions are pending since long, in the eventuality of petitioners filing a revision within eight weeks from today and complying with the other statutory pre-requisites, the revision shall be considered to have been filed within limitation. 6. The writ petitions are disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J ANAND TANWAR/Himanshu Soni /27-29