KAMLESH DIWEDI v. SECRETARY UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION
WPSS/1122/2025 · 2025-07-04
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8578 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8578 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5737 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS No.1122 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Vinod Tiwari and Mr. Rajat Pandey, Advocates for the petitioner.
2. Ms. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate holding brief of Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondents.
3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
“i- a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari to call for the record, of case and quash
impugned recovery order dated 02-06-2022, contain
in Annexure no.2 to this writ petition.
ii- a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to release the
entire amount of leave encashment to the
petitioner.”
4. Heard.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others Vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena and connected matters.
6.
Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.
7. Since the matter is covered, the writ petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others Vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena and connected matters.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
04.07.2025 SK