SHRI S.D SOCIETY AND ORS v. SHASHI BHUSHAN MANCHANDA
COCP/3225/2024 · 2025-04-07
Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85755 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85755 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-3225-2024 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3225-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.04.2025
Shri Sanatan Dharam Education Society (Regd.) and others
......Petitioner Versus Shashi Bhushan Manchanda
.........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocate,
for the respondent.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
This contempt petition has been filed under Sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for taking action against the respondent for intentionally and wilfully violating and disobeying the undertaking given in the reply dated 11.09.2023 (Annexure P-1) filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in CWP No.18410-2023, titled as Shri Sanatan Dharam Education Society (Regd.) and others vs. The State of Haryana and others.
AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.22 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-3225-2024 (O&M)
-2-
2.
The main petition i.e. CWP-18410-2023, out of which, the present contempt petition has arisen, has already been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 07.04.2025. Therefore, the present petition stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 07.04.2025 passed in CWP-18410-2023.
3.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 07.04.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.22 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document