149 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8295-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 31.07.2025 ROHIT AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Jaswinder Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 7. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of two days from today, in the light of notification No. HOME-HM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch). In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. REENA 2025.08.04 00:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRWP-8295-2025 -2- The petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. 31.07.2025 (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) reena JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No REENA 2025.08.04 00:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh