Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8574 (ALL)

ROHIT VERMA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/2384/2025 · 2025-09-11

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2384 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Pradeep Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.144 of 2024, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, 34 I.P.C., Police Station-Bansdih Road, District-Ballia, during the pendency of trial. 4. This is the second bail application. First bail application of the applicant was rejected by co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30763 of 2024. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further argued that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.06.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. This Court had called for status of trial from the trial court concerned. As per the status report dated 06.09.2025 received from the trial court concerned, file has yet not been committed as sureties have not been filed. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the period of incarceration of the applicant and taking into consideration the status of trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Singh Sengar, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rishabh Kumar Rohit Verma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 9. Let the applicant- Rohit Verma, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 12, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 2384 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad