Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85728 (MAD)

SADHU v. Gajendran

CRP/3836/2025 · 2025-08-19

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No.3836 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CRP No.3836 of 2025 Sadhu ... Petitioner Vs Mrs.Amirthammal @ Ponnamal (died) 1.Gajendran Jayaraman (died) Kasi (died) Chellammal (died) (added as per order in I.A.No.251/91) 2. K.Dhinakaran 3. Mrs.Kanthamani 4. Pushparaj 5. Murugan 6. Saravanavel 7. Mrs.Mahalakshmi 8. Mrs.Kalaivani 9. Jeenasenan 10.Muninathan 11.Mrs.Govindammal 12.Kumar (Respondents 6 to 12 impleaded as per Order in I.A.No.91 of 2015 dated 21.01.2015 and I.A.No.1004/2007 dated 20.10.2017) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3836 of 2025 13.Mrs.Vasanthi 14. Baskar (R.13 and R.14 impleaded as per order in I.A.No.553/2015 dated 13.04.2015 and I.A.No.1004/2007 dated 20.10.2017) 15. Mrs.A.Vimala 16. Mrs.M.Vanaja 17. Mrs.G.Kumaravathi 18. Mrs.Krishnaveni (R.15 to 18 impleaded as per order in I.A.No.1003/2017 dated 20.10.2017) 19. Mrs.Valar @ Janaki 20. Mrs.Shanthi 21. Mrs.Gomathi (R.19 to R.21 impleaded as per order in I.A.No.1005/2017 dated 20.10.2017) 22. Sasi 23. Sivanandham 24. Deiva Sikamani 25. Parthasarathy 26. Ms.Parvathi 27. Mrs.Sundari 28. Priya 29. Ms.Lakshmi 30. Ms.Saranya 31. Saraswathi 32. Purushothaman (Respondents 1 to 32 are not necessary parties to this revision and hence given up) 33. Gangadharan ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3836 of 2025 Revision filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to dispose of the application in I.A.No.23 of 2020 in O.S.No.245 of 1987 and renumbered as O.S.No.107 of 2017 on the file of District Munsif Court, Poonamallee. For Petitioner : Mr.Abishek Jenasenan ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Considering the limited relief sought for by the revision petitioner, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 3. It is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the suit was originally instituted for partition way back in the year 1987 and the matter came upto this Court and this Court remanded the matter and to the trial Court and the plaintiff passed way and an application was taken out to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole plaintiff in I.A.No.23 of 2020. The revision petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of I.A.No.23 of 2020 which is pending for the last five years P.B.BALAJI.,J https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3836 of 2025 sr 4. In view of the above, I am inclined to allow the revision directing the District Munsif, Poonamallee to dispose of I.A.No.23 of 2020 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is allowed. No costs. 19.08.2025 Index: Yes/No Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order sr To The District Munsif Court, Poonamallee CRP No.3836 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis