Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138317-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17719 of 2025 Petitioner :- Premlata And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Pravesh Yadav,Swatantra Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. List of fresh cases revised. No one is present to press this petition. 2.Sri Shashi Dhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 9.7.2025, registered as Case Crime No. 0174 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2) BNS, 2023, PS Belhar Kalan, District Sant Kabir Nagar, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 4. We find that F.I.R. dated 9.7.2025 is an F.I.R. in respect of the same incident dated 25.6.2025 in respect whereof the petitioner no.1, Prem Lata had lodged F.I.R. dated 26.6.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 159 of 2025, therefore, the incident is admittedly from both the sides. 5. Although the prayer for quashing of FIR has been made, but without insisting on the same, only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 BNSS. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017 Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017 and in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147. 6. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Kumar Manish Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad