CWP-21753-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 114 ZILE SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Ms. Suyma Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition the respondents to step Shivender Sharma, 2. Learned State counsel has received instructions fro respondent/Director, Secretary Education, which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, she contends that the Department is examining the petitioner’s case for stepping up of pay as his service book as well as that of his junior has been received from the concerned District Education Officer 3. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to finally decide the petitioner’s case for stepping release all consequential benefits months. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: ZILE SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Suyma, Advocate for Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to step-up the petitioner’s pay at par with that of his junior, Shivender Sharma, and revised his pensionary benefits accordingly. Learned State counsel has received instructions fro respondent/Director, Secretary Education, vide memo dated which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, she contends that the Department is examining the petitioner’s case for stepping as his service book as well as that of his junior has been received from the concerned District Education Officer. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to finally decide the petitioner’s case for stepping release all consequential benefits as admissible, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21753-2025 Decided On: 21.08.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, seeking a writ of mandamus directing up the petitioner’s pay at par with that of his junior, and revised his pensionary benefits accordingly. Learned State counsel has received instructions from the second vide memo dated 21.08.2025, which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, she contends that the Department is examining the petitioner’s case for stepping- as his service book as well as that of his junior has been received . In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to finally decide the petitioner’s case for stepping-up of pay and as admissible, within a period of three Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, directing up the petitioner’s pay at par with that of his junior, m the second , which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, she - as his service book as well as that of his junior has been received In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the second f pay and within a period of three Aman Dua 2025.08.26 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-21753-2025 4. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 21.08.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025 -2- In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the Aman Dua 2025.08.26 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document