Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144734 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6544 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunny Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Mashaluddin Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Copies of statements of the informant as well as the injured under Section 180 B.N.S.S. and the medical reports produced by Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A., are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 125 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190 B.N.S., Police Station Hathras Junction, District Hathras. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The incident is alleged to have occurred on 09.04.2025 at 23.30 hours and the first information report was lodged on 10.04.2025 at 13.51 hours. The delay is fatal to the prosecution case. The name of the applicant was subsequently disclosed by the informant and the injured. It is contended that the said statements are afterthought and discredit the prosecution case. As per the statements of the injured and the informant to the police, a vague role has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused injury to the injured. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was subsequently disclosed by the informant and the injured; as per the statements of the injured and the informant to the police, a vague role has been assigned to the applicant; the applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused injury to the injured; and, at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Sunny Kumar be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 10. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 11. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 12. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad