IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 203 CWP-24443-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2025. INDERPAL SINGH RANDHAWA ... Petitioner(s) Versus PUNJAB STATE COMMISSION FOR NRIS AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. J.S. Grewal, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Raghav Garg, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) CM-3590-CWP-2025 Vide order dated 19.03.2025, notice in the present application seeking revival of the main writ petition was ordered to be issued to the non-applicants/respondents. Today, learned State counsel as well as counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 submit that they have no objection to the instant application, seeking revival of the main writ petition, which was disposed vide order dated 07.05.2024, being allowed. The present application is accordingly allowed. The main writ petition is ordered to be revived at its original number. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.15 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24443-2022 (O&M) -2- Main case Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 06.09.2022 passed in Complaint No. 3929 of 2022 passed by the Punjab State Commission for NRIs alleging that the same was illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. 2 Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 contends that the matter has already been settled amongst the parties and he has instructions to state that the respondent No3 shall withdraw the original complaint that has been filed by him before the Punjab State Commission for NRIs. 3 In view of the aforesaid statement, present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. The respondent No.3, however, shall remain bound by his statement. May 13, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.15 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document