- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17608 WP No. 105571 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 105571 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. LAXMI W/O. RAVI HOSURKAR, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KAALI HONI, HINDASGIRI, TQ. KALAGATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR GUNJALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-580 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD-580 008. 3. CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KALAGATAGI, TQ. KALAGATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. 4. LAXMI BAI W/O DEVJI PATIL, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17608 WP No. 105571 of 2025 GOWDRU ONI, R/O. KALAGATAGI TALUK, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. 5. VIJAYLASHMI W/O DATTHAYA NAIK, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, GOWDRU ONI, R/O. KALAGATAGI TALUK, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. 6. UMA BAI W/O KALLESH PATIL, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, GOWDRU ONI, R/O. KALAGATAGI TALUK, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. 7. GEETHA W/O RAMACHANDRA INAMDAR, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, GOWDRU ONI, R/O. KALAGATAGI TALUK, DIST. DHARWAD-580 008. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK T. KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-G DATED 28.08.2024 NO. KRA.SAM / P.PAM.KA./ KAM.V / VICHARANE/VAHI/2024-25/105 IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ECT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17608 WP No. 105571 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) The petition is filed assailing the order dated 28.08.2024 passed by the Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Kalaghatagi, wherein he has refused to enter the name of the petitioner in the property records based on unregistered document dated 29.06.2019. 2. The Court does not find any reason to interfere with the said order. 3. In case the petitioner has any claim under the said document dated 29.06.2019, the petitioner is at liberty to establish the same as advised in law. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMP CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 22