[2025:RJ-JP:8728] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2712/2024 Jitendra Kumar @ Jeetu S/o Sanwarmal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Golanya Mod Rampura, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In District Jail Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/02/2025 1. The instant second bail application is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. arising out of FIR No.112/2022, registered at Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 302, 452, 120B, 34 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused has submitted that the accused-applicant is behind bars for a period of two and a half years and charge- sheet is filed in the instant matter. It is further submitted that the accused-applicant is the sole bread earner of the family. 3. Further, it is submitted that statements tendered by certain witnesses does not mention any specific allegation qua accused- applicant. Lastly, it is submitted that trial is static for a certain period of time. [2025:RJ-JP:8728] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2712/2024] 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the instant second bail application filed by the accused-applicant and submitted that the first bail application was rejected by this Court on justifiable grounds and reasons. 5. It is further submitted that the evidences qua recovery of weapon are placed on record and offence committed by the accused-applicant is heinous in nature. 6. Further, it is submitted that there is evidence available qua motive of the accused-applicant in committing the act of killing. Lastly, it is submitted that there are specific allegation levelled against the accused-applicant, moreover, the bail application of the co-accused in the instant matter is dismissed by the Court. 7. Heard and considered. 8. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court has noted that there are evidences available on record qua recovery of weapon; that the allegations levelled against the accused-applicant are of heinous nature; that bail of the co-accused in the instant matter is dismissed, therefore, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting upon the merits, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the accused-applicant. 9. Accordingly, the second bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /1