MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. DR. NITIN BANSAL COMMISSIONER STATE TAX
CAPL/4176/2025 · 2025-09-16
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4176 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned standing counsel for opposite party.
2. Today, learned standing counsel has filed compliance affidavit of opposite party, which is taken on record. On the basis of compliance affidavit, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with, which is not objected by learned counsel for the applicant.
3. Under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed.
4. Accordingly, file is consigned to the record. September 17, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi, Samarath Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Mahendra Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) Dr. Nitin Bansal Commissioner State Tax .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad