JAI NARAYAN AGARWAL v. STATE PUBLIC SERVICES TRIBUNAL UTTARAKHAND
WPSB/191/2014 · 2025-03-10
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8563 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8563 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1629-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB No. 191 of 2014 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
(1) Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2) Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
(3) Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.
(4) Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
(5) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
10.03.2025
Aswal