Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8563 (RAJ)

SATISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLR/1217/2013 · 2025-08-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33596] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1217/2013 Satish S/o Late Shri Gordhan, R/o Village Murikka, P.S. Roopwas, District Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through PP 2. Vishnu @ Pappu S/o Shri Rame 3. Tikam S/o Shri Rame 4. Shankar Lal S/o Shri Inder Lal 5. Rajendra @ Rajjo S/o Shri Inder Lal 6. Hemant S/o Shri Uttam 7. Kishan S/o Shri Siyaram 8. Uttam S/o Shri Siyaram Respondents No.2 to 8 R/o Village Murikka P.S. Roopwas District Bharatpur 9. Magan @ Dinesh S/o Shri Dhani Ram, R/o Gajipur, P.S. Bayana District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurodh Chaturvedi with Mr. Tej Kiran Nainpuriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma with Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Gorang Agrawal for Mr. Rinesh Gupta Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/08/2025 This revision petition has been filed before this Court challenging the order dated 02.08.2013 passed on the application filed by the complainant-Satish under Section 319 of Cr.P.C.. It is admitted fact that the criminal trial Session Case No.31/2011 in which the impugned order was passed has been decided on [2025:RJ-JP:33596] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1217/2013] 26.07.2014, therefore, when the criminal trial has been completed and there is a judgment of conviction dated 26.07.2014 in Session Case No.31/2011, hence, application filed under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. in that criminal trial has become infructuous. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/21