Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8562 (AP)

Surisetty Venkata Sainadh, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/1226/2020 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

% APHC010092242020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1226 OF 2020 Between: 1. Surisetty Venkata Sainadh, S/o. Appala Naidu, Hindu, Aged about 30 years, presently residing at 903, Parkview Dr, APT 409, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A- 19406. 2. Surisetty Appala Naidu, S/o. Late Kasiviswanadham, 64 Years R/o. Flat No. 13, Bhavani Apartments-1, 0pp. to More Supermarket, Balayya Sastry Layout, Visakhapatnam-530013. Gavar, ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravathi. 2. S.Jahnavi (Malla Jahnavi), W/o. S. Venkata Gurunadha Rao, Hindu, Aged about 27 Resident of D.No. 2-38-45/2, Paruchurivari Kakinada, East Godavari District, Permanent Resident 66/1, Gavara Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam. Sainadh, D/o. M.V. years, claiming to be the Street, Perraju Peta, of D.No. 35-1- ...Defacto Complainant/Respondent // 0 % Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 1843 of 2017 (take cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C) on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all proceedings in C.C.No. 1843 of 2017 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above criminal petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Rayaprolu Srikanth, Advocate Counsel for Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for Respondent No.2: - The Court made the following order: % APHC010092242020 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE DR JUS-nCE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI CRIMINAL PETITION Nq. 1226/2070 0^0 [3396] 0^ PRATAPA Between: ^ AGED ^''PALA NAIDU, HINDU 903, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED 4 TLir- and ' STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AMRAVATHI. 6/1, GAVARA KANCHARAPALEM, VISKHAPATNAM . Peti«on under Section 437/438S"ofcr P cTnd'’^^^^^^ SZar ' “naTc^XS^ represented by its HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused- 1.RAYAPROLUSRIKANTH 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) ^ 2 0 The Court made the following; ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioners/A. 1 & A.2 seeking for the following relief: "... to quash the proceedings in C.O No. 1843/2017, on the fiie of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Viskhapatnam. ..." 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal", none represented for the Petitioners today. 3. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners. 4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1/State is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed .. •. Sd/-GHELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To. 1. The I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri Rayaprolu Srikanth, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC’s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies GPC sree Jr’ HIGH COURT DATED: 06/08/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 1226 OF 2020 * |we„i Sec„0„ -M DISMISSING THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION