HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26530 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Shri Shailesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Shri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of Criminal Case No.1422 of 2023 (State Vs. Irfan Khan @ Nazim and others), arising out of Case Crime No.199 of 2022, under Sections 354-A, 354-B, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Collector Bukganj, District Bareilly, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Bareilly, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. Irfan Khan Alias Nazim And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.199 of 2022, under Sections 354-A, 354-B, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Collector Bukganj, District Bareilly, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Bareilly, against the applicants, are hereby quashed. 7. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 18, 2025 RKM A482 No. 26530 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad