- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558 RSA No. 6104 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.6104 OF 2010 BETWEEN: MAHADEVI W/O. RAMU HANCHINAL ALSO KNOWN AS MAHADEVI D/O. BASAPPA DIDDIMANI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NEAR KEB, BASAVAN – BAGEWADI, DIST. BIJAPUR-587208. …APPELLANT (SMT. MAHADEVI W/O. RAMU HANCHINAL-APPELLANT-ABSENT) AND: 1. SHAKUNTALA W/O. RAMU @ RAMAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. APMC QUARTERS, MAHALINGAPUR, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587201. 2. SMT. SANGAWWA W/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL, SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS. 2A. SMT. BALAWWA W/O. ANNARAI BEELUR, YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.11.28 10:40:03 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558 RSA No. 6104 of 2010 AGE: 68 YEARS, R/O. ATHALATTI, DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208. 2B. SMT. LAYAWWA W/O. SHARANAPPA NAIKODI, AGE: 53 YEARS, R/O. LACHYAN, TQ. INDI, DIST. VIJAYPUR-586211. 2C. LAKSHMAN S/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: 51 YEARS, R/O. ATHALATTI, DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208. 2D. SM. KASTURI W/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: MAJOR, R/O. ATHALATTI, DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.G. YATNAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (A TO D)) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W. ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2010 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE JAMKHANDI SITTING AT MUDHOL IN R.A.NO.144/2004 ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.07.2004 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) COURT MUDHOL IN O.S.NO.285/2002, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS PREFERRED. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558 RSA No. 6104 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ) It is observed by this Court that the matter is of the year 2010 and despite showing the name of the appellant in the cause list, the appellant has not appeared. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE YAN CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2