Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85607 (KAR)

SMT. ANJUM W/O MEHBOOB A ELAHI H.B., v. SHRI MEHBOOB A ELAHI H.B. S/O LATE H.B.VALISAB

RPFC/100059/2024 · 2025-09-15

G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12020 RPFC No. 100059 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100059 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANJUM W/O. MEHBOOB A ELAHI H.B., AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD 2. M.B.MOHAMMED ASHFAQ S/O. MEHBOOB A. ELAHI H.B., AGE: MINOR, OCC. STUDENT 3. MOHAMMED TANVEER H.B., S/O. MEHBOOB A ELAHI H.B., AGE: MINOR, OCC. STUDENT ALL RESIDING AT D.NO227, WARD NO.16 OPP. KEB MUDDAPURA KAMPLI, DIST. BALLARI. THE PETITIONER NO. 2 AND 3 ARE MINOR R/BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. ANJUM W/O. MEHBOOB A ELAHI I.E. PETITIONER NO.1 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. IRANAGOUDA K. KABBUR, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI MEHBOOB A ELAHI H.B. S/O. LATE H.B.VALISAB AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC. HELPER OF KSRTC 2ND DEPOT R/O. BHAGYAJYOTHI ANGAR, RAILWAY STATION RAOD, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.17 12:57:01 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12020 RPFC No. 100059 of 2024 TQ. MOLAKALMURU, DIST. CHITRADURGA-577501 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. GAYATRI S.R., ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC FILED IS UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THE PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 27.01.2023 PASSED IN CRIL. MISC. NO.57/2022 BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BALLARI, IN PARTLY ALLOWING THE MAINTENANCE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN, IN PART DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO PAY MONTHLY MAINTENANCE OF RS.15,000//- PER MONTH IN FAVOUR OF PETITION NO. 1 TO 3 FROM THE DATE OF PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECTLY RESPONDENT TO MAINTENANCE HAS PRAYED BEFORE THE TRAIL COURT, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: “Herein, the counsel for Appellant submits as under: That, in the above Petition, the Respondent herein had filed RPFC No.100072/2023, challenging the judgment and order dated 27.01.2023 passed in Crl. Misc. No.57/2022 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court Ballari, which had partly allowed the maintenance petition filed by the Petitioners and same was dismissed by the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12020 RPFC No. 100059 of 2024 order dated 20.06.2024 which is after the filing of this Petition. Further in view of the conformation of the order the present petition does not survive for consideration. Therefore I am herewith submitting the memo of withdrawal.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE AC CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 52