DEEPANKAR BORO AND 3 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Crl.Pet./251/2024 · 2025-06-10
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8560 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8560 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010045352024
2025:GAU-AS:7557
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./251/2024 DEEPANKAR BORO AND 3 ORS S/O SRI BIPIN CHANDRA BORO, R/O HOUSE NO. 14, SALBARI PANCHATIRTHA PATH, OPPOSITE SALBARI L.P. SCHOOL, NOONMATI, DIST-KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781020 2: BIPIN CHANDRA BORO S/O LATE DHUAH RAM BORO R/O HOUSE NO. 14 SALBARI PANCHATIRTHA PATH OPPOSITE SALBARI L.P. SCHOOL NOONMATI DIST-KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSAM-781020 3: SMTI. KHIRODA BORO W/O SRI BIPIN CHANDRA BORO R/O HOUSE NO. 14 SALBARI PANCHATIRTHA PATH OPPOSITE SALBARI L.P. SCHOOL NOONMATI DIST-KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSAM-781020 4: SMTI. GITANJALI BORO D/O SRI BIPIN CHANDRA BORO W/O SRI SANGAM JYOTI BORAH R/O HOUSE NO. 609 SHYAMJYOTI COMPLEX 2ND FLOOR NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA BORBARI BRANCH WARD NO. 25
Page No.# 2/3 BORBARI GUWAHATI-36 KAMRUP (M) ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:SMTI. MONALISHA DEORI W/O SRI DIPANKAR BORO D/O LATE BIJOY DEORI R/O C/O SRI KHOGEN CH. BORO VILL-2 NO. KHUPA MADLABARI MUKALMUA BUS STAND LOHARKATHA PIN-781126 DIST- NALBARI ASSAM AND P/R/A JAPARKUCHI (NEAR CHOWK BAZAR C.R.P.F. CAMP) P.O.-CHOWK BAZAAR P.S. AND DIST- NALBARI (ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S HAZARIKA, MR. H BURAGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, R BISWAS (R-2),MR. A CHOUDHURY (R-2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER Date : 11.06.2025
1. Heard Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam and Mr. S. Islam,
learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this Criminal petition, Police has filed the Charge-Sheet. According to the
Page No.# 3/3
learned counsel for the petitioners he filed the Criminal Petition for quashing of the FIR.
3. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he intends to withdraw this petition so that he can file a fresh Criminal Petition praying for quashing of the FIR.
4. The prayer is allowed.
5. The Criminal Petition is disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant