Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 971/2017 Dr. Manju Soodh W/o Dr. R.K. Khanna, 1 AG-2 Sagar Hights Raghu Behari Maharani Farm, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Personnel Ka- 3/Enquiry/, Secretariate, Jaipur
2. The Secretary, Medical and Health (Gr.-2), Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. The Collector and District Magistrate, Bhilwara.
4. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 11/03/2025
1. By way of filing this petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 17.06.2016 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, by which the petitioner has been punished with stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect.
2. Admittedly, the aforesaid order is appealable under Rule 23 of the The Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short ‘the Rules of 1958’), but without availing alternative remedy of filing appeal, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court by way of filing this petition.
(2 of 2) [CW-971/2017]
3. It is settled proposition of law that whenever alternative efficacious remedy is available to a person, he cannot be allowed to bypass the jurisdiction of Appellate Authority.
4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority by way of filing an appeal.
5. In case, any appeal is submitted by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today, the Appellate Authority is expected to hear and decide the same on its merits, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months thereafter, ignoring the period of limitation.
6. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court and she is not aware about passing of this order, Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner on her address mentioned in the memo of cause title for her intimation.
7. The stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/61