Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8559 (GAU)

SABITA LAHKAR v. BIJULI KALITA

I.A.(Civil)/888/2025 · 2025-05-25

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010044792025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/888/2025 SABITA LAHKAR R/O FATASIL AMBARI TINALI, GUWAHATI-25 2: DHANJITA LAHKAR FATASIL AMBARI TINIALI GUWAHATI 3: RIJUMONI LAHKAR AMBARI TINIALI JYOTI PATH NEAR RANGPATHAR GUWAHAT VERSUS BIJULI KALITA W/O MR AHIL TALUKDAR, R/O AK DEB ROAD, FATASIL AMBARI, NEAR KALI MANDIR DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN 781025 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R C SAIKIA, MR. R C SAIKIA,MS. K SAIKIA,MR. S B BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 26.05.2025 Heard Mr. R. C. Saikia, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant, assisted by Ms. M. M. Das, Advocate. Also heard Mr. H.K. Sarma, learned counsel for the sole respondent. This application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of CPC praying substitution of the names of (i) Smti. Sabita Lahkar; (ii) Smti Dhanjita Lahkar; and (iii) Smti Rijumoni Lahkar in place of Late Nagendra Nath Lahkar, who filed the Review Petition No. 108/2022 in RFA No. 123/2017. Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the sole respondent has fairly submitted that he has no objection if the names of the applicants are substituted, as prayed for. Accordingly, Registry is directed to substitute the names of (i) Smti. Sabita Lahkar; (ii) Smti Dhanjita Lahkar; and (iii) Smti Rijumoni Lahkar in place of Late Nagendra Nath Lahkar in the Review Petition No. 108/2022 arising out of RFA No. 123/2017. The interlocutory application is disposed of. After substitution, the connected review petition shall be listed for hearing on 27.06.2025 and till then, the interim order passed in the review petition shall continue. JUDGE Comparing Assistant