Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85584 (ALL)

PUNAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/17638/2025 · 2025-09-03

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17638 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for petitioner and learned AGA for State. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Station House Officer, Police Station Mardah District Ghazipur to investigate the case in a fair and proper manner. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Station House Officer, Police Station Mardah District Ghazipur to recover the victim as early as possible. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Superintendent of Police, District Ghazipur to ensure fair investigation in the matter." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the daughter of the petitioner has been recovered by the police and has already been handed over to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. 5. Regarding the investigation, the petitioner may take recourse to the directives in the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. LAWS(SC)-2007-12-69. 6. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 4, 2025 RA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bhushan Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Punam Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad