DR. ANAND S/O CHINTAMANI UPADHYE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/108223/2025 · 2025-11-17
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85578 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85578 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15699 WP No. 108223 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 108223 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
DR. ANAND S/O. CHINTAMANI UPADHYE, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O: MAHISHAWADAGI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591304. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAJID AHMED GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BENGALURU, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NORTH REGION, BELAGAVI DIST: BELAGAVI-590001.
4.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001.
5.
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591034.
6.
THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591034.
7.
POLICE SUB INSPECTOR
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15699 WP No. 108223 of 2025
ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591034. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 7 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 30.10.2025 AND 31.10.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-G TO G3 RESPECTIVELY AND ARREST THE ACCUSED PERSONS IN TERMS OF THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2025 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN CRL. P.NO. 103186/2025 AND CRL.P.NO.103186/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the orders passed by this Court, all the accused, whose regular bail or anticipatory bail that had been cancelled, have all been taken into custody.
The learned AGA would also inform the Court of the same.
In that light, the petition is rendered infructuous and disposed as having become infructuous.
SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE kmv CT:ANB