Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85576 (KAR)

DR RADHIKA B.U v. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH

WP/100803/2025 · 2025-11-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15730 WP No. 100803 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100803 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR. RADHIKA B.U AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AYUSH SPECIALIST, R/O. B 12, VIMS QUARTES OPP. MEDICAL GIRSL HOSTEL CANTONMENT AREA, BALLARI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL S DESAI, AND SRI. SHEBA A. KHANAPUR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, DHANWANTRI ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE DISTRICT AYUSH OFFICER, DISTRICT GOVERNMENT AYURVDIC HOSPITAL, DISTRICT BALLARI. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.3/2024- 2025 DATED 26/7/2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-, AS ILLEGAL AND IN CONTRAVENTION OF ARTICLE -311 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15730 WP No. 100803 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, by order dated 24.09.2025, had passed the following direction: “Three weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied by 31.10.2025, re-list this matter on 06.11.2025 for dismissal of the petition.” 2. Despite the directions issued by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP CT: ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 204