Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85568 (PNJ)

SATPAL AND OTHERS v. SH. T.V.S.N. PRASAD IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/3171/2024 · 2025-09-02

Nidhi Gupta

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 213 Satpal and others Shri T.V.S.N. others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 20.3.2024 Court in CWP Haryana and others dated 13.3.2024 passed by the same co No.2158 of 2020 titled as “Ashish Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, which was disposed of with the following observations : COCP-3171-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3171 of 2024 Date of decision : Satpal and others Versus Shri T.V.S.N. Prasad, IAS, Chief Secretary, State of Haryana and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. J.P. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 20.3.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-26250-2022 titled as “Sumer and others vs. State of ana and others”, which was disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.3.2024 passed by the same co No.2158 of 2020 titled as “Ashish Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, which was disposed of with the following ions :- “xxx xxx xxx 43. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the respondent 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3171 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2025 …..Petitioners Prasad, IAS, Chief Secretary, State of Haryana and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Sumer and others vs. State of ”, which was disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.3.2024 passed by the same co-ordinate Bench in CWP No.2158 of 2020 titled as “Ashish Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, which was disposed of with the following In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the respondent-State pass VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the petitioners that against the order dated 20.3.2024 (Annexure P the respondents had filed LPA No.2356 26.9.2024 was dismissed the State has filed Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025, in which the order dated 26.9.2024 passed in LPA No.2356 COCP-3171-2024 (O & M) appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is entitled for regularization/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the speaking order keeping given by the Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each petitioners qua their respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said b be given notionally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears w be extended from the date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of filing the petition by the said petitioner. xxx xxx xxx” At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that against the order dated 20.3.2024 (Annexure P the respondents had filed LPA No.2356-2024, which vide order dated 4 was dismissed and against the said order dated 26.9.2024 the State has filed Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025, in which the order dated 26.9.2024 passed in LPA No.2356 2 appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is found entitled for regularization/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the speaking order keeping in mind the directions given by the Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each petitioners qua their respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said benefit shall be given notionally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears will only be extended from the date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of the petition by the said petitioner. At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that against the order dated 20.3.2024 (Annexure P-1) 2024, which vide order dated and against the said order dated 26.9.2024 the State has filed Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025, in which the order dated 26.9.2024 passed in LPA No.2356-2024 has been VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document stayed. Copy of the order dated 31.1.2025 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. the present contempt petition may be disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same subject to the res said Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025. September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3171-2024 (O & M) stayed. Copy of the order dated 31.1.2025 passed by Hon’ble me Court is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present contempt petition may be disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same subject to the res said Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025. Ordered accordingly. Rules stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 stayed. Copy of the order dated 31.1.2025 passed by Hon’ble me Court is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present contempt petition may be disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same subject to the result of the said Special Leave to Appeal No.2175 of 2025. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document