IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19463 of 2024 ====================================================== Chitranjan Singh S/o Yogendra Pratap Singh, resident of Village-Kota, Post- Karmahari, P.S.-Kuchhila, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohania, Dist. Kaimur. 4. The Block Supply Officer, Nuwaon, Dist. Kaimur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Adv. Ms. Diksha Kumari, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 04 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 4 20-08-2025 1. Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order contained in Memo No. IV-14-2024/263 dated 6.7.2024 passed by the Licensing authority by which he was pleased to stop the allotment of the petitioner on the ground the renewal fee of the license has not been deposited within statutory period. (ii) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to accept the renewal fee and restore/renewed the license of the petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.19463 of 2024(4) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 because the petitioner has already deposited the renewal fee vide challan to the tune of Rs. 1500/- on 16.10.2022 and Rs. 600/- on 10.01.2024 and the same has also endorsed by the Licensing authority on license itself on 15.01.2024.” 2. At the outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that since this matter is squarely covered under the order dated 28.06.2016 passed in CWJC No. 1361 of 2014 (Pramod Kumar Versus The State of Bihar & Ors.), this writ petition may also be disposed of on the same term and conditions. 3. Having regard to the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the petitioner as well the fact that at the time of passing of Annexure-P/6, the renewal fee with late fine was already deposited by the petitioner, which has not been denied by the authority, let the error committed by the petitioner be condoned for once and her PDS licence in question be restored. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, the present Writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment passed in CWJC No. 1361 of 2014 (supra) by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Patna High Court CWJC No.19463 of 2024(4) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 5. Interlocutory Application, if any, shall stands disposed of. Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U