IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (214) Ram Avtar State of Haryana CORAM: Present: ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, 1. has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant, when the case was called upon. 2. 3. matter with the observations that last opportunity is granted to argue the appeal. However, none has appeared on behalf of the appel observations, 4. to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 5. July 23, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the appellant. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Lalit Pradhan, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (ORAL) Though learned counsel for the respondents are present, but n has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant, when the case was called The instant appeal is of the year 2017. This Court, vide order dated 13.02.2023, had adjourned the matter with the observations that last opportunity is granted to argue the appeal. However, none has appeared on behalf of the appel observations, and further two years time has In view of the above position, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. Ordered accordingly. ( , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-1810-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.07.2025 …Appellant Versus ...Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana Pradhan, Advocate for respondent No.5. (ORAL) Though learned counsel for the respondents are present, but none has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant, when the case was called appeal is of the year 2017. This Court, vide order dated 13.02.2023, had adjourned the matter with the observations that last opportunity is granted to argue the appeal. However, none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite such and further two years time has elapsed. In view of the above position, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No one has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant, when the case was called This Court, vide order dated 13.02.2023, had adjourned the matter with the observations that last opportunity is granted to argue the lant despite such In view of the above position, we are left with no other option but ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ) MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.28 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment