205. IN TH Eusub Quresh alias Yusuf State of Haryana and another CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. under Section Sections 120 District Faridabad. 2. following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked him to join investigation: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Eusub Quresh alias Yusuf Versus Haryana and another HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Shashikant Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., in case FIR No. 120-B, 406, 420 of IPC, registered at Police Station District Faridabad. On the last date of hearing i.e. following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked to join investigation:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR in question. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to join investigation and cooperate with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, while draw Court to the role attributed to the petitioner Yusuf Qureshi that he was involved along with all other accused in the entire E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44100-2024 Date of decision: 02.04.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents N’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Shashikant Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. seeking the concession of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.120, dated 22.04.2024, under , registered at Police Station Sector 31, date of hearing i.e. 16.01.2025, while noticing the following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR in question. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to join investigation and cooperate with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, while drawing the attention of this Court to the role attributed to the petitioner Yusuf Qureshi that he was involved along with all other accused in the entire s , , under Sector 31, while noticing the this granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR in question. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to join investigation and cooperate with the investigating agency. ing the attention of this Court to the role attributed to the petitioner Yusuf Qureshi that SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.03 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-44100-2024 - 2 - dealings with the complainant Shri Ram Aggarwal, has submitted that although no specific and direct role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR in question, however, an amount of Rs.3 lakhs was transferred by the complainant into the account of the cousin of the petitioner-Eusub Qureshi @ Yusuf Qureshi. On a pointed query put to the learned counsel for the State as to whether the petitioner-Yusuf Qureshi has any previous criminal antecedents, he, on instructions, has replied in the negative.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 16.01.2025, petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation much less for his custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 16.01.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE April 02, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.03 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document