IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 FAO-M-145 of 2018(O&M) Date of Order:27.05.2025 Sulekha .Appellant Versus Rohit Kumar ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. On 21.07.2022, the following order was passed:- “As per the office report, notice issued to the respondent has been received back unserved with the remarks of his father that he is not residing at the address. This matter is being adjourned sine-die to enable learned counsel for the appellant to get it listed after having the correct address of the respondent.” 2. The learned counsel representing the appellant has not come forward to attend the hearing, despite intimation by the office to this effect. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE May 27, 2025 nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.27 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document