Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8552 (RAJ)

RATI RAM KHATIK S/O SHRI BHAGI RATH PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SAW/133/2025 · 2025-03-05

Bhuwan Goyal, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9671-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 133/2025 Rati Ram Khatik S/o Shri Bhagi Rath Prasad, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Post Narainpur Tehsil Thanagadi, District- Alwar, Having Government Employee Id- Rjal201402028020 ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Sainik Kalyan Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Sainik Kalyan Vibhag, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Sainik Kalyan Vibhag, Room No. 7225, Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. The District Sainik Kalyan Adhikari, Sainik Kalyan Vibhag, Opposite Company Bagh, Alwar, District Alwar- 301001. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Arpit Jain with Mr. Manish Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 05/03/2025 1. The challenge to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the petition against the transfer is premised mainly on the ground that the appellant is a low-paid employee and has been transferred to a distant place. 2. On consideration of the legal position, learned Single Judge refused to grant any relief. However, to the extent learned Single Judge issued a direction to join and disciplinary action, cannot be sustained and that order was not warranted. [2025:RJ-JP:9671-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-133/2025] 3. We give the appellant-petitioner liberty to prefer a representation for change of his transfer on the ground of hardship. 4. The instant appeal is accordingly, disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Sudeepak/197-S