IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87379 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2024 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar S/O Ram Janam Singh R/O Vill.- Kohraul, P.S.- Karpi, Dist.- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mayank Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution is that father of the informant had been running a ‘gumti’ of eggs beside NH-110. On 07.08.2024 , the petitioner and other co-accused persons came at the egg shop of the informant’s father and asked to prepare Omlets. It is further alleged that when he denied to provide omlets, the accused persons including the petitioner herein assaulted the informant’s father with ‘lathi’, ‘danda’ ‘iron rod’ and ‘fists’. Accordingly, the FIR 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87379 of 2024(3) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others assaulted him with ‘lathi’, ‘danda’, ‘iron rod’ and ‘fists’ but during the investigation, it has come that there is no sign of assault with ‘lathi’ and ‘iron rod’ rather it was found that the deceased was assaulted with ‘fists’. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Further submission is that there is no specific allegation against anyone that they assaulted with any weapon. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 17.08.2024 having no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 170 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jehanabad. Jagdish/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T