Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138724 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9089 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- Preetam Singh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Pandey,Surendra Narayan Mishra Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"(i) Direct to court below i.e. learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court no. 6, Moradabad to decide the application 6C in Original Suit no. 1283 of 2023 (Om Prakash Vs. Preetam Singh and another) within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to the parties and also direct both the parties maintain status-quo till the disposal of 6C application."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.6, Moradabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad