Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85467 (PNJ)

SUNIL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22582/2025 · 2025-08-06

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22582-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 SUNIL STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Jawahar Lal Goyal for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to TGT Sanskrit under Pw been promoted, i.e. 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Addit notice on behalf of the respondents notice, dated 15.04.2025 Elementary Education with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Jawahar Lal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to t TGT Sanskrit under PwD category with effect been promoted, i.e. 08.08.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case second pending legal notice, dated 15.04 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State and 15.04.2025, will be decided by the Education, by passing a speaking with law within a period of three months. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22582-2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate inter alia, seeking a writ of promote the petitioner to the post of with effect from the date his junior has petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this second respondent is directed to 15.04.2025, Annexure P-14, in a ional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending legal the second respondent/Director, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance seeking a writ of he post of from the date his junior has ce raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a accepts l Director, order in accordance Aman Dua 2025.08.08 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-22582-2025 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered a 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 06.08.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the petitioner In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.08.08 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document