Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85458 (PNJ)

VIKAS MITTAL v. ANURAG VERMA

COCP/3201/2024 · 2025-01-13

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VIKAS MITTAL ANURAG VERMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. H.C. Arora, Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Intra-Court Appeal bearing No.LPA In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present peti revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. 13.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: VIKAS MITTAL Versus ANURAG VERMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Court Appeal bearing No.LPA-2657-2024. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3201-2024 Date of Decision: January 13, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed in an 2024. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does tion at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 13, 2025 Learned State counsel representing the respondents stayed in an In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does tion at this stage, however, with liberty to seek TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.14 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document