IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84512 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA RAIL P.S District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sharma Son of Bindu Sharma Village- Haldi Bari, Ps- Janki nagar, Dist- Purnea P/A-Dhima, Ward no. 14, P.S. -Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5555 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA RAIL P.S District- Khagaria ====================================================== Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari W/o Late Gulsagar Rishideo Resident of Village- Rajni, Ward No 6, PS- Murliganj, District- Madhepura. At present Khutpothia, ward no. 9, P.S. - Jankinagar, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 84512 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5555 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rahul Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 04-04-2025 Heard. 2. Both applications arise out of the same case i.e. Saharsa Rail P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 and accordingly, the same are being heard and disposed of together by this common order. 3. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioners was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84512 of 2024(3) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 rejected by orders dated 02-07-2024 and 01-07-2024 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 21139 of 2024 and 33237 of 2024 respectively. 4. The report, which was called for from the court below has been received. 5. From perusal of the report of the court below, it appears that out of 13 charge sheeted witnesses, five witnesses have already been examined. 6. In view of the above-said facts and circumstances, presently, both the applications are disposed of with observation that the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after a period of one year or after examination of at least 10 witnesses, whichever is earlier. A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T