Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Madhya Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 854 (MP)

NARMADA PRASAD KRUMVANSHI v. KEDAR PRASAD KRUMVANSHI

SA/2989/2019 · 2025-01-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL ON THE 5th OF DECEMBER, 2023 SECOND APPEAL No. 2989 of 2019 BETWEEN:- NARMADA PRASAD KRUMVANSHI S/O BHAGWANDEEN KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, GRAM ICHAULA TEHSIL UNCHEHARA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....APPELLANT (NONE) AND 1. KEDAR PRASAD KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BHAGWANDEEN KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, GRAM ICHAULA TEHSIL UNCHEHARA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RAJKUMAR KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BHAGWANDEEN KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, GRAM ICHAULA TEHSIL UNCHEHARA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. CHHOTI KRUMVANSHI W/O SHRI BHAGWANDEEN KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, GRAM ICHAULA TEHSIL UNCHEHARA (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. VIDHYA KRUMVANSHHI W/O GAVI KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HARDASPUR TEH. MAIHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. RAJKUMARI KRUMVANSHI W/O UTTAM SINGH @ THANEDAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, VILLAGE TIGRA KHURD TEH. MIHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. MUNNI KRUMVANSHI W/O GOVIND KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, HARDASPUR TEH. MAIHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. BHAGWATIDEEN KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BINDA KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 1 Signed by: KUMARI PALLAVI SINHA Signing time: 12/6/2023 11:39:33 AM Signature Not Verified OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE ICHOLA TEH. UNCHEHERA (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. RAJENDRA PRASAD KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BINDA KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, VILLAGE ICHOLA TEH. UNCHEHERA (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. KUNJBIHARI KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BINDA KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE ICHOLA TEH. UNCHEHERA (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. PREMLAL KRUMVANSHI S/O SHRI BINDA KRUMVANSHI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE ICHOLA TEH. UNCHEHERA (MADHYA PRADESH) 11. STATE OF M.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI GOVIND PRASAD PATEL, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS 1-6) This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER None for the appellant even in the second/passover round at 2:30 p.m. 2. Shri Govind Prasad Patel, Advocate for respondents 1-6. 3. It appears that the appellant has lost his interest in prosecuting this second appeal. Resultantly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only). 4. It is made clear that, if any application for restoration is filed, the deposition of cost of Rs.5,000/- with the High Court Bar Association, Jabalpur shall be a condition precedent to entertain the application for restoration, if any. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand dismissed. 2 Signed by: KUMARI PALLAVI SINHA Signing time: 12/6/2023 11:39:33 AM (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE KPS 3 SINHA Signing time: 12/6/2023 11:39:33 AM