- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14804 RSA No. 5097 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 5097 OF 2010 BETWEEN: 1. SHRI ANNASAB BALU BALLOLLE AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI SACHIN ANNASAB BALLOLLE AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. SHRI SUBHAS ANNASAB BALLOLLE AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANAND ASHTEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI JAMBU BANDU NARAWADE AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI SUKUMAR BANDU NARAWADE AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.11.03 14:55:12 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14804 RSA No. 5097 of 2010 3. SHRI MAHAVEER BANDU NARAWADE AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 4. SHRI SAGAR BANDU NARAWADE AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 5. SRHI AJIT BANDU NARAWADE AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORAGAON-591 216, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AKSHAY A. KATTI, ADVOCATE; R1, R2, R4 AND R5-NOTICE SERVED; R3- HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W. ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13-11-2009 PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK COURT-I, CHIKODI IN R.A.NO.26/2006 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2006 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C CHIKODI IN O.S.NO.75/2003 AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT BY DISMISSING THE SUIT OF THE RESPONDENTS AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14804 RSA No. 5097 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has no instructions on behalf of the appellants. In view of the said submission, the appeal being of the year 2010, there are no sufficient reasons to grant any adjournment. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE SSP CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 17