Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C.M.P.No.16702 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.105996 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 800 days in preferring the above appeal.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner.
3. Notice to first respondent has been returned with an endorsement ‘insufficient address’.
4. Mr.S.Arunkumar, learned counsel, takes notice for second respondent and Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel, takes notice for third respondent.
5. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 800 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned.
6. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.S.Arunkumar, learned counsel for second respondent and Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel for third respondent, at the time of admission. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 20.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis