138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAVNEET GUPTA SH. DEVINDER SINGH KALYAN IRS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Parvez Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sanjiv Rathi, Joint Excise and creation of supernumerary post of Junior Programmer has been initiated and the same is going to take 6 weeks. He further submits that the benefits along with arrears in terms of titled as “Ashish shall be released to the petitioner thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Pending application(s) 10.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: NAVNEET GUPTA Versus SH. DEVINDER SINGH KALYAN IRS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Parvez Chaudhary, Advocate for the Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sanjiv Rathi, Joint Excise and Taxation, Commissioner (Admn.II) submits that process for creation of supernumerary post of Junior Programmer has been initiated and the same is going to take 6 weeks. He further submits that the benefits along with arrears in terms of decision rendered by this Court in “ Ashish Sharma and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others, ased to the petitioner thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the /concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3158-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 10, 2025 ........Petitioner SH. DEVINDER SINGH KALYAN IRS AND OTHERS .....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sanjiv Rathi, Taxation, Commissioner (Admn.II) submits that process for creation of supernumerary post of Junior Programmer has been initiated and the same is going to take 6 weeks. He further submits that the benefits along this Court in “CWP-2158-2020” and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others, In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the /concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. , if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) February 10, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sanjiv Rathi, Taxation, Commissioner (Admn.II) submits that process for creation of supernumerary post of Junior Programmer has been initiated and the same is going to take 6 weeks. He further submits that the benefits along 2020” and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others, In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the - as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.13 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document