S.H.M MANJUNATH S/O S.H.M SHANMUKHAIAH v. IDBI BANK
RFA/100444/2025 · 2025-10-29
B Muralidhara Pai, R Devdas
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85376 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85376 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14528-DB RFA No. 100444 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100444 OF 2025 (MON)
BETWEEN:
1.
S.H.M. MANJUNATH S/O. S.H.M. SHANMUKHAIAH, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: PVT. SERVICE.
2.
SMT. GAYATHRI W/O. S.H.M. MANJUNATH, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, BOTH ARE R/O. NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL, DANAPURA-114, HOSAPETE, DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583222. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S. B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
IDBI BANK, HOSAPETE BRANCH, VIJAYANAGARA DIST., R/BY. ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO SOLE RESPONDENT IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.07.2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.49/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAPETE, DECREEING THE SUIT AS PRAYED FOR BY THE PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT AND DISMISS THE SUIT IN O.S.NO.49/2024, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAPETE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14528-DB RFA No. 100444 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 29.10.2025 stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of court.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all exceptions. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in view of the said memo.
3. Since the appeal pertains to the year 2025 and has been disposed of as settled out of court, the office is
directed to refund the court fee to the appellants in accordance with law.
Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE
VB /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5