Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136417 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8970 of 2025 Petitioner :- Heeramani Devi Respondent :- Indubala Pandey And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Mishra,Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i. direct the learned court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, District- Varanasi to decide the temporary injunction application (6C) of petitioner dated 28.07.2025 pending before him within specific period in Suit No.1083 of 2025 (Heeramani Devi and others Vs. Indubala and others)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 28.07.2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, District-Varanasi to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad